CSI

media type="custom" key="4705179"My name is Detective Romanini. Two weeks ago on a beautiful sunny day I was called to a crime scene at Felix Navidad's two bedroom, one bathroom beach house, on the patio. The alleged victim was Felix, he never kept a job, always criticized people, and had no love. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra Goode, she and Felix were in this together. This suspect's guilt was confimed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene. The most incriminating piece of evidence was the fingerprints on the cups. The evidence was found near the body. The test performed was a fingerprint test. The results of the test were that on Felix's cup we found that Felix and Kendra. This connects the suspect to the crime because she had accsess to his cup which means she could have did something to it. The next piece of evidence collected was the secret note. The test performed was the hand writing test. The results of the test were that it was written in Kendra's hand writing which means that she wanted to take attion off of her so she could frame someone else. This connects the suspect to the crime because that means she wanted to frame Vera. Another piece of evidence collected was the white powder on Kendra's shoe. The test performed was a powder test. The results of the test were that the powder on Kendra's shoe was the powder on the ice cube tray. This connects the suspect to the crime because that means when Felix ingested the cola with the melted ice laced. He fell asleep long enough so that on the way to the morg he escaped. The last piece of evidence collected was the cola from the cups. It was found in the cup next to the body. The test performed was a PH test. The results of the test were that his cola was a base which isn't right because It is supposed to be an acid but it wasn't so the ice made it be a base. This connects the suspect to the crime because whatever she put in the ice made his cola be a base. According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. That day Vera went for a walk, Alfredo was outside with Felix, Gene was at the beach with his dog, and Kendra was "taking a shower" but she wasn't. When Alfredo went to the bathroom Kendra put the powder in the ice. Then when Alfredo came back out he started screaming for help. When everyone came to the patio they called 911. The powder Felix ingested made his pulse stop for a few minutes so he was dead but on the way to the morg he woke up from his death and ran away. Therefore, Kendra Goode committed the crime of helping Felix Navidad fake his death for a reason that nobody knows. **Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 98% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__ Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  __** || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __** The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  **__ || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.__**  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || __**The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene**.__  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || __ **Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.**  __ || Conclusion summarizes information.  || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.__**  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.__** || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.__**  || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  __** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged__**.  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 56/57